|
Get
healthy go to church.
A
Wall Street Journal article last week (May 3) reported
on the results of a study that, "a growing body of scientific
evidence shows that Americans who attend religious services at
least once a week enjoy better-than-average health and lower rates
of illness, including depression. Perhaps most important, the
studies show that weekly attendance confers a significant reduction
in mortality risk over a given period of time."
According
to the Journal, "The panel reported that the studies
showed a 25% lower mortality rate for those who attend religious
services at least weekly. . . Religious services at churches,
temples and mosques boast various features that can be beneficial
to health meditation, a social network, a set of values
that discourage smoking, infidelity and other unhealthy behaviors."
As
the medical professor who chaired the panel concluded, "After
seeing the data, I think I should go to church."
Hey,
that's what we've been saying all along.
Michael
Duduit, Editor
michael@preaching.com
www.michaelduduit.com
Click
here to visit "I Was Just Thinking" for insights
and observations about faith and culture issues.
If
you missed this year's National Conference on Preaching, click
here to learn about ordering audio cassettes and CDs of conference
sessions and workshops.

It's
all about the weekend
In
a recent edition of his Leadership Uncensored newsletter,
Ed Young, Jr., reminded pastors: "At Fellowship, our favorite
saying is, 'It's all about the weekend.' Why? Because throughout
scripture, the value of corporate worship is hammered home again
and again that's huge. Also, the weekend is the biggest
port of entry into your church. That's where most of the guests
and visitors show up. So, to make an indelible impression on the
most people, you've got to have the weekend hitting on all cylinders.
"Here
are some of the ways we've stayed weekend-focused at Fellowship
Church:
"1.
Put weekend preparation at the top of your day. Personally, I
keep the weekend the main thing by making it the first thing of
my day. The most difficult thing that I do is thinking about,
researching, and praying for the messages it's very taxing.
If I don't jump on that in the morning, I won't have the energy
I need to do it justice.
"2.
Make the weekend a priority in your spending. If you really want
to know what is the most important thing in your church, look
at where you're spending the resources. If you are spending more
money on stuff that has nothing to do with the weekend, then you're
off balance and you're not focused on what's most important. The
majority, I think, of funding, resources, and staffing should
go towards the weekend.
"3.
Give the weekend serious attention during staff meetings. During
our weekly Executive Team meetings, what are we spending most
of our time talking about? The weekend. We talk about it, we critique
last weekend, we compare numbers, and discuss what went well,
and what didn't go well. Then we look at the next weekend and
target what we can do to make it a better weekend. Of course we
talk about other stuff that's happening in the church but we keep
our top staff people focused on the weekend." (For more from
Ed, visit www.creativepastors.com.
And don't miss Ed's article on "Communicating with Creativity"
in the May-June issue of Preaching
magazine (www.preaching.com).)

Bugs
Bunny meets Brian McClaren
In
an article on "Christianity, Pop Culture, and the Quest for
Hip," Russell Moore talks about the "updating"
of the Warners Brothers cartoon characters, and makes the comparison
to elements of the emergent church movement. He writes:
"Many
good critiques of the 'generous orthodoxy' of Brian McLaren have
been offered noting everything from the movement's embrace of
a faulty view of truth to its flirtation with understandings of
salvation that reject the necessity of explicit faith in Christ.
But even beyond the specific doctrinal crises in the emergent
movement, there is the sad fact that this really isn't all that
new.
"That's
because the problem is not simply with the postmodern fuzziness
of Brian McLaren and his devotees. The problem instead is that
American evangelicalism long ago sold out to cultural accommodation
to the consumerist, therapeutic ethos of contemporary American
society. Now that side of evangelicalism is as 'lame' in the eyes
of the culture as a Looney Tunes cartoon from the 1960s. And so,
evangelicalism 'reinvents' itself in the image of a brooding,
angst-ridden twenty-something coffeehouse culture.
"Of
course, there is more than one expression of the 'emergent' phenomenon
and not all of it is bad. The call to community and authenticity
in life together are as old as the New Testament. Some of the
worship practices that are emerging from the emergent church are
an improvement on the canned infotainment of standard evangelical
fare. But within the McLaren wing of the 'emergent' church, the
simultaneous rejection of propositional truth and Christocentric
revelation coupled with a suspicion of authority in general
result in a Christianity that just happens to coincide
with the cynical milieu of reality television, NPR-style religious
pluralism, and the postmodern fads of the local university English
department.
"That
may be hip, but it certainly isn't counter-cultural." (Click
here to read the full article.)
http://www.henryinstitute.org/commentary/read.php?article=20050311

Prophetic
preaching requires 'blood on the sermon'
In
his sermon at last fall's Academy of Homiletics meeting, Princeton
prof Brian Blount observed, "I have, admittedly, often gone
for what a combat tactician might call the sermonic clean kill.
The military clean kill concept is, as far as I am concerned,
a draconian one. Tactically, it may work, it may well achieve
its aims by surgically obliterating its targets on the ground.
Spiritually, it fills the air with the sensibility of democratically
sanctioned assassination, the targeted, sophisticated, and most
importantly unmessy killing of one to thousands on the military
and political cheap. I first heard the term when reading op ed
pages about the Clinton administration's Balkan Air War strategy.
The fight from the air, for our side at least, was a relatively
clean war. It achieved its objectives, its "kill," by
transforming people and the institutions they managed without
getting our soldiers bogged down on the ground.
"I,
for one, am not suggesting that we have more messy wars. To the
contrary, I would prefer that we arrange for a circumstance where
we have no more wars at all. I am afraid, however, that in a world
where it is thought that war can be fought and won cleanly, on
the cheap in terms of human lives and military material, that
we will be more prone to engage in activities of fighting where
we would have heretofore exhausted every non-fighting avenue that
we could. What is next for a country that finds it can topple
entire regimes in a relatively clean way? . . . The words of Lawrence
of Arabia are perhaps pertinent here. 'Making war or rebellion,'
he said, 'is messy, like eating soup off a knife.' And messy it
should be. It is the messiness that deters one from making it
until it is absolutely clear that there is no other way.
"John
(in the Revelation) seems to believe that, as uneasy as the image
may feel, prophetic letters and no doubt prophetic sermons should
engage the person writing or preaching them in a messy, bloody
rhetorical war. The prophet has to know that the objective he
or she seeks will only come at great cost; it will cause a disturbance
that will create chaos in the process of catalyzing change. I
suppose that Martin Luther King, Jr., knew how much his messy
preaching about the Vietnam War was going to cost him. I suppose
that prophets like Jeremiah who told his own people to give up
to the Babylonians because they had become so corrupt that God
had now given up on them must have known how much his messy message
was going to cost him. I suppose that prophets like Micah and
Amos and Hosea and Isaiah who railed against the abuses of a people
they desperately loved must have known that because of those railings
their own people would end up despising them. Unpatriotic. Turncoats.
Betrayers. All of them.
"I
suppose it fits the image of John who would tell his Christ believers
to declare a singular allegiance to Christ even when he and they
knew that making such a declaration went against the grain of
Roman patriotic sensibility and Roman political-religious loyalty,
and might therefore cost them their lives. I can't imagine that
John came to the point where he felt it was necessary to write
the material he wrote, in the harsh language that he wrote it,
unless he felt that there was no other way to encourage and challenge
his people in the midst of their very dangerous circumstance.
In the rhetorical war in which he found himself, where he would
only inspire a victorious faith for his people if he killed off
their fear of Rome and its draconian desire to be worshipped as
god and lord of history, John realized that he was in for the
messiest of fights. His prophetic sermon would have to have blood
all over it."

Take
advantage of Preaching On-Line
If
you are a subscriber to Preaching
magazine, don't forget that you automatically have access to the
resources of Preaching On-Line,
including new sermons posted each month, plus content from past
issues and a search engine for our database of illustrations and
sermons. You'll find the username and password on the contents
page of the current issue of Preaching
magazine, then go to www.preaching.com
to enjoy digital access to the current issue plus much more.
If
you're not a subscriber already, just click
here to begin your Preaching
subscription today!

ILLUSTRATION:
Authority, Sexuality
In
his book Evangelical Landscapes: Facing Critical Issues of
the Day (Baker), John G. Stackhouse, Jr., writes, "Ignorance
of the Christian faith in our culture is compounded by an equally
fundamental problem: a growing distance between Christian ways
of deciding about matters of truth and virtue and other ways of
deciding about such things.
"To
pick an example both obvious and important, we can look at sexuality.
. . . The very way most North Americans decide about sexual issues
is not Christian. Who seeks nowadays to investigate all that the
Bible says about such matters so as to submit to its authority?
Who listens attentively to the clergy? Who takes time to seek
traditional wisdom? . . .
"Homosexuality
has become significant as the latest battleground in the war for
sexual freedom, and that war is itself a campaign within the larger
revolution in personal liberty. . . . What we need to recognize
more fundamentally, both within our church disputes on this matter
and in society at large, is that this cultural dispute is not
fundamentally about homosexuality but about ethical authority.
Who or what is going to say what is right or wrong? The reflexive
answer from the man on the street, the woman on the legal bench,
or the cleric in the pulpit is the same in many cases: a vulgar,
shallow liberalism that amounts merely to the bromide that the
individual should be free to do what he or she likes as long as
his or her freedom does not impinge on another's.
"When
it comes to ultimate matters, then, many of our North American
neighbors have resorted either to a secularism that frees one
from all religious authority or to a hyper-individualistic 'religion
ala carte.'" (Click
here to learn more about the book Evangelical Landscapes.)

ILLUSTRATION:
Impurity, Immorality
Ken
Walker wrote in the Christian Reader about six-foot-two-inch,
280-pound Clay Shiver, a center for the 1995 Florida State Seminole
football team. Regarded as a likely All-American, when Shiver
got word that Playboy magazine planned to name him to their
All-American team, he prepared his response: "Thanks, but
no thanks." "I don't want to let anyone down,"
he said, "and number one on that list is God."
In
his response, Clay Shiver quoted Luke 12:48: "To whom
much is given, from him much will be required." . . .
Fleeing immorality to remain pure seems dramatic in our day. But
risking a bit of ridicule is a small price to pay to maintain
integrity and honor. (Turning Point Daily Devotional, 4-30-05)

ILLUSTRATION:
Timing, Miracles
Charley
Reeb shares the story (adapted from the Sunday School Times)
of an Eastern king who was seated in a garden while one of his
counselors spoke of the wonderful works of God. "Show me
a sign," said the king, "and I will believe."
"Here
are four acorns," said the counselor. "Majesty, will
you plant them in the ground, then stoop down for a moment and
look into the clear pool of water?" The king did so.
"Now,
look up," said the counselor.
The
king looked up and saw four oak trees where he had planted the
acorns. "This is indeed the work of God!" the king exclaimed.
"How
long were you looking into the water?" asked the counselor,
and the king replied, "Only a second."
The
advisor said, "Eighty years have passed as a second."
The king looked at his garments and they were threadbare. He looked
at his reflection in the pool and he had become an old man. "There
is no miracle here!" he said angrily.
"Yes,
it is God's work," answered the counselor, "whether
he did it in one second or in eighty years."
|